Choosing the right trustee structure is one of the most important decisions when setting up a Self-Managed Super Fund (SMSF). An SMSF can generally be established with either:
While both structures can legally operate an SMSF, the choice can have a significant impact on asset protection, administration, borrowing capacity, succession planning, and future flexibility.
At iCare Super, we help clients establish and manage SMSFs with structures designed to meet their long-term retirement and investment goals. Below is a detailed comparison of SMSF corporate trustees vs individual trustees to help you make an informed decision.
An individual trustee SMSF is a structure where the members of the SMSF personally act as trustees.
Under SMSF legislation:
For example:
A husband and wife establish an SMSF. Both individuals become trustees and are responsible for managing the fund.
For a single-member SMSF, another individual may need to be appointed as an additional trustee if a corporate trustee is not used.
Although an individual trustee structure may appear simpler and cheaper initially, there are several issues to consider.
A common misunderstanding is that the trustee with the larger member balance has greater control.
This is not correct.
All trustees have equal legal responsibility for managing the SMSF, regardless of their individual member balances.
For example:
Both trustees are equally responsible for:
Where a single-member SMSF uses individual trustees, an additional individual trustee may be required.
This means:
This can create practical issues because the additional trustee has legal authority over the SMSF even though they do not own any member benefits.
A corporate trustee SMSF uses a company as the trustee of the fund.
The SMSF members are usually appointed as directors of the trustee company.
For example:
ABC Super Fund
Trustee:
ABC Super Pty Ltd
Directors:
Members:
The company legally owns and manages the SMSF assets on behalf of the members.
Corporate trustees are becoming increasingly popular, particularly for SMSFs investing in property or planning for long-term growth.
A corporate trustee provides greater flexibility when:
With individual trustees, changes often require updating asset ownership records because assets are held in the names of individual trustees.
With a corporate trustee, the company remains the legal trustee, making changes generally simpler.
Many lenders prefer SMSFs with a corporate trustee structure, particularly where the SMSF is borrowing to purchase property through a Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement (LRBA).
A corporate trustee can make the borrowing and ownership structure clearer for:
If you are considering purchasing property through an SMSF, a corporate trustee is often the preferred option.
A corporate trustee allows a single member to have full control of the SMSF.
Instead of appointing another individual trustee who has legal control over SMSF assets, the member can:
This makes corporate trustees particularly attractive for single-member SMSFs.
A corporate trustee can provide smoother succession arrangements.
If a member:
control of the trustee company can generally be transferred more easily through director changes.
This can help protect the long-term management of the SMSF.
With individual trustees, trustees hold SMSF assets personally and may have greater personal exposure.
A corporate trustee provides a separate legal entity between the trustees and the SMSF operations.
While directors still have important legal obligations and responsibilities, the corporate structure may provide additional protection compared with individual trustees.
The main disadvantage of a corporate trustee is the additional establishment cost and ASIC annual company review fee
Although the upfront cost is higher than an individual trustee structure, many SMSF members consider the additional flexibility and protection worthwhile over the long term.
Yes, it is possible to change an SMSF from an individual trustee structure to a corporate trustee structure.
However, the process requires careful management, including:
For SMSFs holding property, additional steps may be required because the legal ownership of assets may need to be updated.
The team at iCare Super can assist with the trustee change process and help ensure the transition is completed correctly.
| Feature | Individual Trustee | Corporate Trustee |
|---|---|---|
| Initial cost | Lower | Higher |
| Ongoing ASIC fee | No | Yes |
| Single-member SMSF control | Limited | Excellent |
| Property borrowing | Less preferred by lenders | Generally preferred |
| Adding/removing members | More administration | Easier |
| Succession planning | More complex | More flexible |
| Asset ownership changes | Required when trustees change | Usually simpler |
| Long-term flexibility | Moderate | High |
While an individual trustee structure may appear cheaper initially, a corporate trustee structure is often the preferred choice for many SMSFs, especially where:
Choosing the right trustee structure at the beginning can help avoid unnecessary costs and administrative complications later.
If you are considering establishing an SMSF or changing your existing trustee structure, contact iCare Super for professional SMSF advice and assistance.
The information contained in this article is provided for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon as personal financial advice, investment advice, legal advice, tax advice, or a recommendation to establish a Self-Managed Super Fund (SMSF).
iCare Super is a specialist SMSF administration and compliance service provider. iCare Super is not a financial planner and does not provide personal financial advice, investment recommendations, or advice about whether establishing an SMSF is suitable for your individual circumstances.
iCare Super does not recommend that any person establish an SMSF. Before deciding to establish an SMSF, you should consider whether an SMSF is appropriate for your circumstances and obtain advice from a licensed financial adviser who is authorised to provide SMSF establishment and financial advice.
The decision to establish an SMSF should take into account various factors, including your investment experience, retirement objectives, available time to manage the fund, costs, risks, insurance needs, investment strategy, and compliance responsibilities.
The information in this article discusses SMSF trustee structures only and is intended to provide general educational information about the differences between corporate trustees and individual trustees.
Every SMSF member’s circumstances are different. The appropriate trustee structure will depend on factors including the number of members, investment strategy, property ownership, borrowing arrangements, residency status, succession planning objectives, and personal circumstances.
While a corporate trustee structure may provide advantages such as greater flexibility, easier administration, and improved succession planning, it may not be suitable for every SMSF.
Before establishing an SMSF, changing trustees, appointing an Enduring Power of Attorney (EPOA), or making decisions regarding SMSF investments, you should obtain advice from appropriately qualified professionals who understand your individual circumstances.
SMSF legislation, taxation laws, and regulatory requirements may change over time. iCare Super does not guarantee that the information in this article remains current after the date of publication and recommends obtaining updated professional advice before taking action.
iCare Super and its employees are not responsible for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information contained in this article.
Comments are closed.